Work indexAB / CS-01

Aerospace quality · Internship case study

Aerospace Quality & NDT Intelligence

Turning inspection records into a repeatable system for defect visibility, faster closure and continuous improvement.

DisciplineNDT · Quality
MethodPDCA + DMAIC
Dossier12 pages
01

Problem

Where performance becomes invisible.

Inspection findings, repeat indications, elapsed time, re-inspection and closure status can live in separate records. The engineering problem is the missing chain from planned work to indication, decision, corrective action and verified closure—not inspection quality alone.

How might a quality team see recurrence and delay early without weakening controlled NDT practice?
P1

Fragmented records

Identifiers and status may differ between work order, report and action log.

P2

Weak taxonomy

Free text hides the difference between symptom, defect family, cause and disposition.

P3

Unmeasured waiting

Queue, approval and reporting time can disappear behind total inspection duration.

P4

Reactive learning

The current finding is closed, but recurrence by part, zone or method remains hard to detect.

Current-state inspection loop
Problem map / 01Current-state inspection loop

The queue, repeat-indication and approval-wait risks made visible.

02

Process

Measure, analyze, improve, control.

The workflow combines PDCA discipline with DMAIC evidence gates. Each stage creates an auditable exit artifact before the next layer of analysis is allowed to begin.

01Work order
02Prepare
03Inspect
04Interpret
05Disposition
06Report
07Close
01

Stage 01

Frame

Set the problem charter, stakeholders and confidentiality boundary.

Exit evidenceApproved scope
02

Stage 02

Map

Walk the inspection process, define status and expose handoffs.

Exit evidenceSigned current state
03

Stage 03

Measure

Build the extract, quality rules, timestamps and baseline KPI logic.

Exit evidenceReconciled baseline
04

Stage 04

Analyze

Stratify recurrence and delay; apply Pareto, fishbone and 5 Why.

Exit evidenceCause hypothesis
05

Stage 05

Improve

Pilot a controlled form, alert route and corrective-action loop.

Exit evidenceBefore / after evidence
06

Stage 06

Control

Version definitions, assign owners and verify action effectiveness.

Exit evidenceHandover + review cadence
03

Solution

A governed NDT intelligence loop.

One event key connects the work order, finding, approval, report and corrective action. A role-based cockpit reveals recurrence, action age and lead time while every visual remains traceable to the controlled source record.

01

Evidence foundation

One row per inspection event with controlled identifiers, method, severity, timestamps, disposition and owner.

02

Decision cockpit

KPI → event → report drill-down, repeat-family alerts and an action-age view.

03

Safety boundary

The dashboard supports decisions; it never authorizes a method, certifies personnel or replaces technical disposition.

04

Control routine

Role access, data reconciliation, versioned definitions and effectiveness review keep the system trustworthy.

LIVE PORTFOLIO MODEL

Aerospace Quality & NDT Intelligence

Illustrative data
18Open inspectionsIllustrative count
8.4%Re-inspectionIllustrative rate
11.2hMedian lead timeIllustrative elapsed time
4Repeat familiesIllustrative flags

Priority signal mix

Surface34
Bond22
Dimension16
Porosity12
Other16

Synthetic portfolio data—replace with verified project records before public use.

Measurement plan · targets, not results

Success is measurable—and guarded.

Targets are proposed pilot criteria, not claimed results. Improvement only counts when source completeness and required inspection gates remain protected.

Inspection lead time−10% to −20%No skipped gate
Re-inspection rateDownward trendNo under-reporting
Report completeness≥ 98%Manual audit
Action closure≥ 90% on timeEffectiveness check
04

Evidence

The dossier, opened up.

The web story keeps the document’s words, engineering logic and visual evidence—then lets the reader move through them at their own speed.

Supplied source captures

The briefing behind the reconstruction.

01 / FULL DOSSIER

Keep the complete engineering narrative.

Source notes support the internship direction and proposed deliverables. The model, charts and targets are a transparent portfolio reconstruction—not confidential company results.

Download PDF
Next case study · 02

Continue the trajectory

Production Intelligence