Work indexAB / CS-02

Industry 4.0 · Internship case study

Production Intelligence with Aprizo / MES

A practical path from disconnected shop-floor signals to faster loss detection, traceability and predictive manufacturing.

DisciplineMES · Operations
MethodKPI → lineage → action
Dossier13 pages
01

Problem

A loss can hide between systems.

Production, quality, downtime, material and maintenance signals can exist without a shared loss hierarchy, trusted KPI logic or timely decision route. A dashboard can look polished while still disagreeing with the line.

How might one defensible event model turn disconnected signals into owned, time-critical action?
A

Availability

Breakdowns, changeover, starving and blocking consume planned run time.

P

Performance

Micro-stops, speed loss and cycle variation erode the ideal rate.

Q

Quality

NOK, scrap, rework and retest can be counted without common context.

F

Flow

WIP, waiting and bottlenecks appear when clocks, states and identifiers disagree.

System and loss map
Problem map / 01System and loss map

ERP, MES, machine, quality and maintenance signals before reconciliation.

02

Process

Connect and reconcile before predicting.

The sequence is deliberate: preserve raw events, transform visibly, version business rules and make every KPI point traceable to its lineage before introducing automation or prediction.

01Source
02Canonical event
03Semantic measure
04Alert
05Owner
06Action
07Outcome
01

Stage 01

Scope + map

Map ERP, MES, machines, quality and maintenance into one loss tree.

Exit evidenceSystem and event map
02

Stage 02

Reconcile

Align clocks, states, IDs, output totals and scheduled windows.

Exit evidenceTrusted baseline
03

Stage 03

Diagnose

Stratify downtime, bottlenecks, recurring NOK and traceability exceptions.

Exit evidencePriority loss logic
04

Stage 04

Prototype

Build role views, drill-down, alert rules and a genealogy path.

Exit evidenceDecision cockpit
05

Stage 05

Pilot

Test one line and one countermeasure with a named owner and stop criteria.

Exit evidenceMeasured intervention
06

Stage 06

Control

Handover KPI rules, review cadences and a validated predictive backlog.

Exit evidenceGoverned operating loop
03

Solution

A production intelligence layer.

A governed semantic model makes OEE, FPY, scrap, cycle gap and downtime comparable. Role-based views connect the headline metric to the station, product, event, source record and accountable response.

01

KPI contract

Each measure has a business definition, event-state logic, exclusions, source, owner, cadence and reconciliation test.

02

Event lineage

A production star links order, product, station, asset, material lot, quality result and downtime reason.

03

Unit genealogy

Supplier lot → receipt → kitting → station events → test → finished unit → shipment.

04

Predictive gates

Descriptive, diagnostic, predictive and prescriptive maturity only advance when the prior evidence gate is passed.

LIVE PORTFOLIO MODEL

Production Intelligence with Aprizo / MES

Illustrative data
71%OEEIllustrative baseline
92.6%FPYIllustrative baseline
3.1%ScrapIllustrative baseline
114mUnplanned stopIllustrative total

Priority signal mix

Changeover138m
Breakdown114m
Material82m
Quality57m
Micro-stop44m

Synthetic portfolio data—replace with verified project records before public use.

Measurement plan · targets, not results

Trust first. Then speed.

The pilot aims to improve operations without hiding variance, changing test rules or creating false predictive confidence. Targets remain hypotheses until verified on approved data.

OEE data agreement≥ 99%Document variance
First-pass yield+2 to +5 ptsStable test rule
Unplanned downtime−10% to −20%No reason hiding
Traceability complete≥ 99%Audit sample
04

Evidence

The dossier, opened up.

The web story keeps the document’s words, engineering logic and visual evidence—then lets the reader move through them at their own speed.

Supplied source captures

The briefing behind the reconstruction.

02 / FULL DOSSIER

Keep the complete engineering narrative.

The supplied notes name Aptiv Kenitra and ‘Aprizo’. The official Dassault Systèmes product is Apriso; the exact platform name must be confirmed. All charts and targets are illustrative.

Download PDF
Next case study · 03

Continue the trajectory

Future Flight Lab